mbt chaussure Transferred by the slow growth in ru

lin06900

,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
Transferred by the slow growth in rural employment due to thinking - the adverse trends in a rural issues

Development time, especially in the urban area through the acquisition of land by a large number of rapid expansion of the time, but also to accommodate a reasonable number of rural employment and rural population Zhuanyi it? In other words, this focus on economic development and expansion of urban growth with the need to transfer the industrial sector of rural employment and rural population growth is compatible? Now the development of Chinese cities have a curious phenomenon is that government agencies have set their own timetable for modernization, and war abbreviated schedule of this phase of modernization. When asked the basis of these tables shows that in 1O years or so,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], many large and medium cities, the goal of modernization will be completed. However, this so-called modernization really make sense? Maybe it makes sense for urban residents, but the main body of China's population accounts for the majority of the rural population make sense? Have much significance? If the benefits of urbanization development in China mainly by the urban residents enjoy the rural population groups can only enjoy the benefits of the edge of this development, and even the benefits of urbanization has nothing to do with most of the rural population, this mode of development of urbanization and modernization is worthwhile to promote? Now Many local governments in the domestic implementation of the so-called It is said that this Many urban development, and indeed have greatly changed this way 7. The success of this development approach, of course, can speak a lot of sense, but one of the most important requirement is often intentionally or unintentionally ignored,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], that the Government holds in the urban management of land resources, holds an absolute monopoly of the land management right. Government in expanding the process of urban construction, a large number of farmers of land acquisition, through planning integration, and then sold the land leased to commercial development companies. The form of from the phenomenon, in this exchange is over, farmers get compensation for land occupation, the government received revenue, developers get the land lease, the three have their place. People look at this exchange process has become accustomed to, it seems that things did not deserve special attention. However, analysis of the principles of economics tell us that this process is very simple, it can be used as a classic case of unequal exchange. When the government expropriation of peasant land by way of payment, when pricing power in the government, farmers are basically no bargaining rights, not to mention the arrangements equitable trading system, a class of things, that in itself is not a right to conduct such transactions. In this relationship on the basis of rights, the Government paid the farmers are generally low cost of land acquisition, not a particularly strange thing. After the government to pay the cost of land acquisition is very low, and then leased to the developer in accordance with commercial prices, thus, cheap to buy and then sell at high prices, the Government has received a lot of difference. According to the analysis of research institutions: from the early 80s to 2004, the government land price and the difference between the actual sale price, at least more than 2 trillion yuan. I think this is still a conservative estimate can not be accurately measured. This is at least 2 trillion yuan of land spread, is called the ultimate secret of the success of urban management. This will tell people why there are so many national financial base is weak in many places, still can drastically to engage in urban construction, urban expansion and the no less significant. This paper analyzes the problem from the logic, we should also think about a more macro issues: 9O years from the last century, China has actually accelerated growth of the economy rely on? Answer to this question, of course, can say many things known , from hardware to software environment, the various elements, but I think there must not be neglected, all levels of government with the farmers land use rights through the unequal exchange, access to a huge amount of development funds. It is this unequal exchange and the resulting huge amount of money, the financial basis for supporting the very uneven development of all levels of government behavior. While the central government's financial concentration is high,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], the local government can still rely on this Here, Chinese farmers have made tremendous contributions and sacrifices. Existing development conditions in China, this may be difficult to avoid the choice. But the problem is that farmers have the right to use the land exchange is not equivalent to a large number of compensation for losses suffered when the reduction of the total land further reduce their development,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], the rapid expansion of the urban economy can not reasonably accommodate the transfer of their employment growth, then the way out, thinking that waiting for us to study and seek effective solutions. (The author: National School of Administration Vice President) Editor Linna 9
More articles related to topics：

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]

nike high heels Tryst _4501