john9221
ORANGE EKSTRAKLASA
Dołączył: 25 Sty 2011
Posty: 1674
Przeczytał: 0 tematów
Ostrzeżeń: 0/5 Skąd: England
|
Wysłany: Czw 1:23, 31 Mar 2011 |
|
|
yilai:
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
not your firm.If you are not yet seeing res
h? A misunderstanding. But he pled guilty. Why would he do that?Craig later said, "I should have had the advice of counsel in resolving this matter. In hindsight, I should not have pled guilty. I was trying to handle this matter myself quickly and expeditiously."This is where I see incongruity with Mr. Craig:1. Innocent people don't plead guilty. Innocent people put up a fight if they are wrongly accused.2. Mr. Craig didn't call for his attorney. The first thing anyone does--guilty and innocent--is call an attorney. The quickest and most expeditious way to handle a legal problem is to get represented.3. Craig said [link widoczny dla zalogowanych], "I am not gay - nor have I ever been gay." This sounds like he believes it is possible to have been gay and then become ungay. It's waffling.Lastly [link widoczny dla zalogowanych], but maybe the most incongruous of all:4. He didn't immediately tell his wife! Now, if I were arrested for something as preposterous as this, I'd go straight home to my wife and tell her, "Listen to what happened to me today. You're not going to believe this."Then Senator Craig decided that the media was to blame.It's all because of the Idaho Statesman. They've been "relentlessly and viciously" harassing him.The media is usually an excellent villain because they do get so much wrong [link widoczny dla zalogowanych], so it's a pretty safe bet as far as sca
Post został pochwalony 0 razy
|
|