uuboot62
ORANGE EKSTRAKLASA
Dołączył: 07 Paź 2010
Posty: 568
Przeczytał: 0 tematów
Ostrzeżeń: 0/5 Skąd: England
|
Wysłany: Czw 13:11, 13 Sty 2011 |
|
|
"House property duty " or " room miserable tax " ?
Author: Controller of Wang music network is early joyous gentleman
(5) is house property duty legal?
Professor Lang Xianping once had pointed out, house property duty is illegimate. His basis is consumer when buying house property, already pay the charge of this pay, ask for house property duty to be equivalent to repeating levy again, and the expropriation of a such categories of taxes, existing the process is legal sexual problem, so called process is legal quality, it is the regulation according to our country, this kind of taxation should first draft resolution National People's Congress, vote through the National People's Congress after agreeing, just can carry out.
The viewpoint that I think Lang Xianping is taught is OK of deliberate.
The first: Of the categories of taxes with new any leave proof, it is the government is again on people body shearing, the problem did not depend on it cutting abb, depended on it cutting abb to be put on to oneself however? Still knitted a windbreak mat to all sheep?
The 2nd: Why cannot I repeat levy? The wealthy person that has house property swept across wealth of society through the hire income of house property, be because is wealthy person cleverer than us, ? Because he compares the person that pays rent,still created labor value more? American scholar those is gotten. Barnes is in " capitalist 3 " in point out clearly: "Of wealthy person rich, depend on the law of jungle to communal rights and interests gobble up, the poor's poverty, because they have few and few income only from inside communal rights and interests,be " . So they are in the process that enjoys fortune, should not think this fortune is ought to, he should thank this society, he also behoove passes on this society. If do not have this bit of self-identity, so not only house property duty did not open the basis that ask for, death duty leaves proof also became illegimate.
The 3rd: Of any law carry out should satisfy 3 to want justice, they are respectively 1: Accord with " fair, just " principle, 2: Accord with " constitution " , 3: The process is legal. House property duty is advanced and both go up problem of it doesn't matter, but go up in last bits, it is to need to perfect really. We cannot because of have good will and make above all break the law violate the thing of compasses, if such doing, easy good intention does bad thing, also opened bad precedent.
(6) why we support or to why we support or oppose house property tax?
Why we support or to why we support or oppose house property tax?
Still remember " does big country rise abruptly " ? Dutch faces in a paragraph of description is very interesting:
1543, spanish king obtained Dutch mastery through the means with allied politics. When facing king to announce Holand is one part of Spain, face king to differentiate afresh when Dutch administration area, when facing the new governor that kingly group comes, dutch the calm was accepted. Can poor when Spanish king benefit general when 2 worlds extend the hand the moneybag to them, dutch revolted however.
Without legal principle solution Dutch is opposite monetary manner. They do not care about national independence, do not care about ethical dignity, who to care about to dominate them,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych] on sale,, who will manage them. The is replete coin only merely pocket that they care about, who thinks handle extends the bag that takes them, who is their enemy. They and reason of Spanish king opposed violated their regulation because of king namely. But although they drove away aggressor, they also run this country without time and energy, and cordial commission British queen will help them manage, but the protective cost as a result of what queen asks for is too high, and called in queenly administrative power. This is an odd state really, in this country, be willing to become without the person it seems that ruler and controller, be interested in politics without the person, although speak of politics, participate in political reform, just also bring to give traders merely bigger go to the lavatory and interest.
Citing this case is to want to show a sense, money bag to the person it is very important.
The government leaves imposing house property tax is extend the hand into popular pocket,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych] on sale,, and house property duty is a long-term categories of taxes, asked for next year to be returned so that ask for this year, unlike a few categories of taxes, one-time expropriation.
" monarch is talked " once admonished the ruler before those (namely the monarch previously) , he says, liege (namely gubernatorial) if cannot receive people's good opinion, also can cause people anything but hate, and if he does not want to be hated by people,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych] on sale,, he must remember two things well, the first thing often stretchs his hand to want money to people namely, the 2nd thing makes the decision of family wife easily namely. Look, the government is at least on this thing, did not consider Majiyaweili's proposal.
The government is actually not all the thing is able. Even if it is able, also not be OK work follow one's inclinationsly. The government leaves ask for house property duty to be equivalent to government and public wanting to manage a bond, gained a right that stretchs his hand to popular money bag newly to oneself, but we know, any rights are linked together with obligation, so of the government gained the right newly to oneself, so present problem is: Is your obligation in the government where?
The government asks for help to our money bag, he must want to have such announcement compulsory: The first, how much do you want to take? The 2nd, do you want how to be taken? The 3rd, do you want how to long be taken all the time so? The 4th, the final policymaker of the use direction of these money, be governmental yourself or the public that give fund? The 5th, of these money deposit, batch equipment, audit, superintend, supervise transparent? Where is authority of know the inside story? The 6th,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych] on sale,, if the government does not use capital people what to boycotts a method by the regulation, by what can be the government punished? The 7th, if is the masses dissatisfactory to governmental use what boycotts measure? Does the government need what to kind of condition accomplish to satisfy popular requirement? Etc
And we are a blank now, is the government not right do these misgive do popular any solution? This is special bloodcurdling a thing. If the government feels glad to can think people levy taxes follow one's inclinationsly, this world makes total absence of justice. The Chinese people that was taught about a hundred years by free, democratic, equal thought fortunately is not Tian Chaohuang any more the official in feudal times below the city, the cornerstone that they know to modern society exists is not any more " on God's earth, is it possible that Wang Tu; Lead Shui Zhibin, is it possible that Wang Chen " feudal and shabby idea, however contracted spirit. We need a government that serves for the masses, we do not need a government that overrides at gas cheeking to incite over the masses; We need a government that seeks happiness for the masses, do not need a government that seeks welfare for him government; We need a government that with founding harmonious society is a target,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych] on sale,, do not need wanton cut apart setting of society, system causes the people to oppose the government that hate, we ask the government is information is public, handling affairs is businesslike, running cost is cheap, what we ask governmental behavior is mirrorred is social popular volition the volition that is not him government. All premise of these things, it is government and masses formulate bond, set bilateral right and obligation, undertake strictly cooperative according to bond next.
So, will look from this angle, the people says with its is to objecting a government leaving impose estate tax, be inferior to saying is the masses the fear of infinite to governmental right dilate and the distrust to the government. powered by:[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
more Information:
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
not be to borrow of course and ugg boots cheap
and MBT Women Barabara coffee shoes
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
and MBT Fumba Cinnabar Men Shoes Sandals
Post został pochwalony 0 razy
|
|