Comparison of the developmental state in Northeast

yxfbbiedtj

Comparison of the developmental state in Northeast Asia Research and Reflection

Are still some way governance and economic development in the industry to play a pivotal role. Of course. WTO on the East Asian developmental state the role of the regulatory guidance and constraints can not be ignored. First, WTO rules and regulations come into force, Japan and Korea to promote their own development of strategic industrial policies adopted by the WTO rules will be binding or even prohibited. The most obvious place is the WTO on the developmental state to promote exports, restricting imports of flexible national industrial policy to the constraints. Because in the neo-liberal rules of the WTO-led,[link widoczny dla zalogowanych], free trade and open markets of the world trade order against the East Asian developmental state in the process of industrialization with the industrial policy, and prohibits other developing countries have to follow the East Asian newly industrializing countries take these successful industrial policy. To this end, the East Asian developmental state governments have actively intervene to adjust the existing strategic industrial policy. Second, the developmental prospects of the Government's Vision and Strategy original developmental state has been unable to adapt to globalization and the challenges of global economic integration, which although not a national economic development and prosperity of the sufficient condition, but it is the current context of countries seeking their own economic development of the necessary conditions for the world economy. Therefore, national protectionism, tariff barriers, encouraging export, import restrictions, control of industrial policy and administrative guidance as to promote economic development, political and economic developmental state model, has been unable to adapt to the era of knowledge economy development of high-tech needs of the domestic economy the. To this end, the developmental state have adjusted their economic structure and industrial policy in order to occupy a Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, the government will give priority to economic development strategy towards the knowledge-intensive industry development, strategic choices of the government's motivation is that since trade liberalization is inevitable. Then they would have in raising value-added products, particularly high technology high-tech industry has won strong international competitiveness. And past development-oriented government So. Government's role and functions will be and it is not the same, but the government can still promote industrial upgrading and technology play a key role. The biotechnology industry, for example, the development of the industry first to ask the Government departments and agencies in promoting competition while promoting research sector and the private productive sector coordination and cooperation. At the same time. Biotechnology innovation and commercialization of bio-industry is also asking the Government to effectively lead the knowledge innovation and application of regulations. In short, the development-oriented government to play to strengthen cooperation and promote competition, effective regulation of the three lead role. First, the general, industrial technology innovation and technology related to basic scientific research of potential commercial applications or the conversion of productive capacity of the effective combination between. Government to create conducive to all types of science, technology and collaboration between the private production sector relationship. On the one hand, public finance and the incubation Fund leap forward for technology innovation provides the incentive mechanism, on the other hand, the Government could promote research collaboration play by fostering technology transfer function of the middle reaches of the intermediary structures, the downstream and upstream private company research institutions together. Second. Technological innovation also relies on the formation of the various departments and agencies the formation of effective competition. And because technology and information inherent defect, build effective competition in the development-oriented interventions also need to play a positive role model government. According to information economics theory, in the case of drift, due to the high cost of investment risk and the reasons for the lack of knowledge of the market incentives for competition and innovation power. This requires the one hand, small and medium scale enterprises to strengthen investment in support, on the one hand to establish a sound IPR protection system, and build a sound legal environment. These are on the Government to increase competition and innovation capacity of a request. Third, scientific development and technological innovation mechanism to establish the same spontaneous and self-regulation is not mediated. In a democratic mechanism, technological innovation has a natural political and public welfare. For scientific applications and industrial development-oriented public consultation as the need for government leadership. In short, the post-industrial or innovative development of democracy-oriented government gradually established a scientific, economic and political cross-point position. From a scientific point of view, the development-oriented government must coordinate domestic and international creative collaboration: From the economic point of view, growth-oriented government needs to foster conducive to the development of productive forces competitive environment technology; from a political point of view, development-oriented government must ensure the integration of scientific research and technology outputs through the process of democratic consultation guide the establishment of effective mechanisms of public regulation. f author: Institute of Jilin University, Ph.D. Chief) Editor Liu Bo