caros9d1utan
KLASA B
Dołączył: 16 Maj 2011
Posty: 25
Przeczytał: 0 tematów
Ostrzeżeń: 0/5 Skąd: England
|
Wysłany: Pią 6:32, 20 Maj 2011 |
|
|
I studied history in the Dark Ages, B.C. (Before Computers).
Most of those semesters began with Neanderthals, a team who didn’t jot much down for none had contrived pencils. By spring, we’d advance to the “modern epoch,” which averaged about 1938.
I didn’t pay many consideration then, but I wish I had. Because we can still study from historical figures, not stuff where they are today.
Like, case in point:
SOCRATES
This Greek philosopher deemed that sagacity and knowledge built character. The extra a person knew, the less likely he’d make a bad decision.
Socrates continually answered his countrymen approximately their beliefs, recommending they bottom ideas not above opinion [link widoczny dla zalogowanych], yet aboard wisdom.
The magnificent man’s merciless search because truth riled some officials, who sentenced him to decease by drinking hemlock.His final question, “Is this stuff poison?” was sadly questioned “yep.”
The lesson: To ascertain verifiable facts, 1 must question both herself and her research sources. If the research isn’t creditable [link widoczny dla zalogowanych], it tin establish problems.
SOPHOCLES
This inventor created melodramas namely commonly centered on a unattached brave character who --in mandate apt help humankind --chose an unpopular course of operation.
Sophocles introduces us to the viability of contrarian musing [link widoczny dla zalogowanych], and the amount of constructing a article around a hero.
The lesson: Building research papers nigh (1) a single person alternatively (2) a contrarian idea can yield interesting
Post został pochwalony 0 razy
|
|