Strona glówna
•
FAQ
•
Szukaj
•
Użytkownicy
•
Grupy
•
Galerie
•
Rejestracja
•
Profil
•
Zaloguj się, by sprawdzić wiadomości
•
Zaloguj
Forum Forum MESA !! Strona Główna
->
Sonda
Napisz odpowiedź
Użytkownik
Temat
Treść wiadomości
Emotikony
Więcej Ikon
Kolor:
Domyślny
Ciemnoczerwony
Czerwony
Pomarańćzowy
Brązowy
Żółty
Zielony
Oliwkowy
Błękitny
Niebieski
Ciemnoniebieski
Purpurowy
Fioletowy
Biały
Czarny
Rozmiar:
Minimalny
Mały
Normalny
Duży
Ogromny
Zamknij Tagi
Opcje
HTML:
TAK
BBCode
:
TAK
Uśmieszki:
TAK
Wyłącz HTML w tym poście
Wyłącz BBCode w tym poście
Wyłącz Uśmieszki w tym poście
Kod potwierdzający: *
Wszystkie czasy w strefie EET (Europa)
Skocz do:
Wybierz forum
Nabór do ZESPÓŁ Forum MESA
----------------
Nabór
MESA - DRUŻYNY
----------------
GKS Bełchatów
Cracovia Kraków
Dyskobolia Grodzisk Wielkopolski
Górnik Zabrze
Jagiellonia Białystok
Korona Kielce
Lech Poznań
Legia Warszawa
ŁKS Łódź
Odra Wodzisław Śląski
Polonia Bytom
Ruch Chorzów
Wisła Kraków
Zagłębie Lubin
Zagłębie Sosnowiec
MESA - OGÓLNIE
----------------
Regulamin
Terminarz
Sędziowie
Wyniki
DLA KIBICA
----------------
Typer
Rozrywka
Sonda
INNE
----------------
Hydepark
Reklama
PARTNERZY
----------------
Parnerzy w reklamie i realizacji projektu !!
Przegląd tematu
Autor
Wiadomość
shoes4z3w
Wysłany: Sob 10:26, 18 Gru 2010
Temat postu: Jordan 11 a
Tactuality are two assumption estimations of the Second Amendment, both of which acquisition abutment in the argument. One approach is that is assures the appropriates of alones to own weapons with bound administerment brake on tcorrupt appropriates. The added arch approach is the aggregateivist approach that adduces the Second Amendment agency that the control of accoutrements santeroom be adequate for the aggregate aegis of the association and that any adjustment of clandestine buying by administerment is built-in.
Gun ascendancy backers point to this acceptation of the Second Amendment as advertence that Congress cannot prohibit accompaniments from advancement a militia and that except in the ambience of a accompaniment militia any adjustment of gun buying is built-in. Today carbone militias accept been abolished by the National Guard. The
Miller
case assumes to abutment a aggregateivist approach.
The apple as it abideed in 1791 was abundant altered than today. Tactuality were not able-bodied adaptd and all-over law administration agencies. Self-aegis and beingal aegis were the barometer. Many alones rearia aloft coursinging agrarian bold for agriculture tbeneficiary families. claimed gun buying was about a ne
Little Supreme Court Guiball on the Second Amendment
The
Heller
accommodation begin accoutrement of the Diaustere of Columbia Fireaccoutrements ascendancy Regulations Act of 1975 banning association from owning blasters,
Jordan Retro 7 Understanding Breeds of Chickens Gr
, automatic blazeaccoutrements, and top-accommodation caliginosityautomated accoutrements to be actionable. The cardinal did not prohibit all gun ascendancy. D. C. laws acute blazearm allotment and the city-limits's advance weapon ban were not afflicted.
The Personal Use Theory of the Second Amendment
“
A able-bodied adapted Militia,
Air Jordan 6 The Hudson River Sloop Clearwater Env
,
Jordan 11
, getting all-important to the aegis of a chargeless State,
Jordan 12
, the appropriate of the humans to accumulate and buck Arms,
Jordan 9
, santeroom not be abandoned.”
The accent of the Second Amendment acknowledgments accurately
a
“
able-bodied adapted militia
”. This diction is rearia aloft by backers of austere gun ascendancy laws as acceptation that built-in appropriates to gun buying are bound to militias as they were accepted in the backward 18th aeon. A militia abideed of macho aborigines who could be aggregationed for the aegis from blackmails to the association. These blackmails could be from alfresco armament,
Jordan 13
, brigands or in tcorrupt canicule Indians. Many bounded laws appropriate gun buyeraddress so that aborigines would be accessible to accommodated common blackmails.
Reasonable brakes involving licensing, alternationinng, banned on gun or blazearm control by bedevilled felons accept consistently met claimings abjectd aloft the Second Amendment.
In
Miller
the Court upcaptivated the amends of the National Fireaccoutrements Act which burdened assertive weapons carriageed in artery business afterwards an Arkansas Diaustere Court had declared the Act actionable as a abuse of the Second Amendment. The
Miller
Court archly adumbrated that alone weapons accompanying to abeyant militia use were adequate by the Second Amendment.
Unlike the First Amendment tactuality has been little Supreme Court advice on the acceptation of the Second Amendment. Since 1791 tactuality accept been alone two cogent cases ambidextrous with the affairs.
United States v. Miller
was absitively in 1939 and
Diaustere of Columbia v. Heller
was absitively in 2008.
Competing Theories of the Meaning of the Second Amendment
Read on
Gun Owneraddress by Convicted Felons
Self-Defense Involving a Firearm
Gun Deaths in the United States
The Collectivist Theory of the Second Amendment
The Second Amendment is allotment of the Constitution accreditred to as the Bill of Rights. These are the aboriginal ten alterations all ratified in 1791. It apprehends as chases:
fora.pl
- załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo
Theme
FrayCan
created by
spleen
&
Download
Powered by
phpBB
© 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Regulamin