Strona glówna
•
FAQ
•
Szukaj
•
Użytkownicy
•
Grupy
•
Galerie
•
Rejestracja
•
Profil
•
Zaloguj się, by sprawdzić wiadomości
•
Zaloguj
Forum Forum MESA !! Strona Główna
->
Zagłębie Sosnowiec
Napisz odpowiedź
Użytkownik
Temat
Treść wiadomości
Emotikony
Więcej Ikon
Kolor:
Domyślny
Ciemnoczerwony
Czerwony
Pomarańćzowy
Brązowy
Żółty
Zielony
Oliwkowy
Błękitny
Niebieski
Ciemnoniebieski
Purpurowy
Fioletowy
Biały
Czarny
Rozmiar:
Minimalny
Mały
Normalny
Duży
Ogromny
Zamknij Tagi
Opcje
HTML:
TAK
BBCode
:
TAK
Uśmieszki:
TAK
Wyłącz HTML w tym poście
Wyłącz BBCode w tym poście
Wyłącz Uśmieszki w tym poście
Kod potwierdzający: *
Wszystkie czasy w strefie EET (Europa)
Skocz do:
Wybierz forum
Nabór do ZESPÓŁ Forum MESA
----------------
Nabór
MESA - DRUŻYNY
----------------
GKS Bełchatów
Cracovia Kraków
Dyskobolia Grodzisk Wielkopolski
Górnik Zabrze
Jagiellonia Białystok
Korona Kielce
Lech Poznań
Legia Warszawa
ŁKS Łódź
Odra Wodzisław Śląski
Polonia Bytom
Ruch Chorzów
Wisła Kraków
Zagłębie Lubin
Zagłębie Sosnowiec
MESA - OGÓLNIE
----------------
Regulamin
Terminarz
Sędziowie
Wyniki
DLA KIBICA
----------------
Typer
Rozrywka
Sonda
INNE
----------------
Hydepark
Reklama
PARTNERZY
----------------
Parnerzy w reklamie i realizacji projektu !!
Przegląd tematu
Autor
Wiadomość
osiks4t7ptan
Wysłany: Sob 5:35, 16 Kwi 2011
Temat postu: nike climate max 20119Privatization Versus State-O
Trade unions are one such group namely views privatization in a negate light. Protest behavior is constantly discerned while any move towards the privatization of whichever utility corporation occurs
nike air max
, even now it is merely equitable creature thought. Trade union chairmen have stated that privatization is a means of reducing manpower required for production.
Private sector participation in the provision of public utilities is not new. Private water services commenced in England during the 16th centenary and lasted for 300 annuals. Similarly, France had private water services during the mid 19th centenary when it was under the dynasty of Napoleon III. In the US, water services were largely private from the 18th century to the early 20th century.
Many economists and business professionals deem that state-ownership provides apartment for political interference in the treatment of utility companies. The controversy is that state-ownership does no loan itself to neutral decision-making. It is believed that this will behalf nor the company neither the public; only the individual stakeholders will behalf.
Afterward
nike air max 2011
, European and North American governments began taking over privately owned utility systems. It was believed that this would ensure service to always segments of society
Air Max TN
, for fire-fighting and to depress the incidence of water-borne diseases.
However, because of the lofty chief intensive requirements of the utility manufacture, privatized systems have not really disappeared. In 2002, the digit of people who received utility services from private companies throughout the world was 300 million.
The transfer of responsibility for the operation delivery;The complete transfer of system ownership; andThe bargain of state-owned rights to private companies.
However, the inverse had happened with the British West Indian Airways (BWIA). When BWIA was privatized, many airline workmen were abridged, thereby lending credibility to the argument against privatization.
Arguments For and Against Privatization
These same people are in favor of privatization. They argue that privatization lends itself to tournament, greater purchaser service and that there is extra focus on best practices and profit. Examples of the unions in the Caribbean that have found success with privatization are Trinidad & Tobago Methanol Company and Trinidad Cement Ltd.
There are also numerous forms of state and personal partnerships. For sample, water services often beg private investment in new facilities. Complete transfer of ownership takes location after the personal investors have been repaid.
To privatize or not to privatize…that is the question.
Today, privatization manifests itself in different fashions. These are:
The argument here is that utility companies should be managed ashore the basis of conference the absences of society, not profit. This could quite well be the reason why, traditionally, fully state-owned administration scamper utility companies have not been described for successful. The elucidation and measures of success are different from those of private companies.
Case Study: Privatization
Read on
Missing Money New York, Florida and Pennsylvania
How apt Incorporate Online, DIY alternatively With an Agent
Ensuring Clean and Safe Water for America
Apart from reduced job security, many have argued that public utilities should not be privatized if the interests of the meager are to be ensured. With privatization comes the hazard of the poor being denied the elementary necessities. Traditionally, government norm has been applied when the service in question has public agreeable specifics. The state is normally a majority shareholder of (or totally owns) the utility companies.
fora.pl
- załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo
Theme
FrayCan
created by
spleen
&
Download
Powered by
phpBB
© 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Regulamin