Strona glówna
•
FAQ
•
Szukaj
•
Użytkownicy
•
Grupy
•
Galerie
•
Rejestracja
•
Profil
•
Zaloguj się, by sprawdzić wiadomości
•
Zaloguj
Forum Forum MESA !! Strona Główna
->
Regulamin
Napisz odpowiedź
Użytkownik
Temat
Treść wiadomości
Emotikony
Więcej Ikon
Kolor:
Domyślny
Ciemnoczerwony
Czerwony
Pomarańćzowy
Brązowy
Żółty
Zielony
Oliwkowy
Błękitny
Niebieski
Ciemnoniebieski
Purpurowy
Fioletowy
Biały
Czarny
Rozmiar:
Minimalny
Mały
Normalny
Duży
Ogromny
Zamknij Tagi
Opcje
HTML:
TAK
BBCode
:
TAK
Uśmieszki:
TAK
Wyłącz HTML w tym poście
Wyłącz BBCode w tym poście
Wyłącz Uśmieszki w tym poście
Kod potwierdzający: *
Wszystkie czasy w strefie EET (Europa)
Skocz do:
Wybierz forum
Nabór do ZESPÓŁ Forum MESA
----------------
Nabór
MESA - DRUŻYNY
----------------
GKS Bełchatów
Cracovia Kraków
Dyskobolia Grodzisk Wielkopolski
Górnik Zabrze
Jagiellonia Białystok
Korona Kielce
Lech Poznań
Legia Warszawa
ŁKS Łódź
Odra Wodzisław Śląski
Polonia Bytom
Ruch Chorzów
Wisła Kraków
Zagłębie Lubin
Zagłębie Sosnowiec
MESA - OGÓLNIE
----------------
Regulamin
Terminarz
Sędziowie
Wyniki
DLA KIBICA
----------------
Typer
Rozrywka
Sonda
INNE
----------------
Hydepark
Reklama
PARTNERZY
----------------
Parnerzy w reklamie i realizacji projektu !!
Przegląd tematu
Autor
Wiadomość
lin06900
Wysłany: Pon 11:11, 25 Kwi 2011
Temat postu: mbt chaussures paris Freedom of speech and not fre
Freedom of speech and not free - Why protect our constitutional freedom of speech
Constitutional protection of civil and political rights of the first is freedom of speech. Other political rights such as freedom of thought, freedom of the press, freedom of association, freedom of education, freedom of study are built on the premise of freedom of speech protected. Why does the Constitution protect our freedom of speech may be based on the most direct answer to a simple answer: because we have a long This is the (Of course,
Belstaff España
, the biological functions of the mouth are also more than that.) Constitutional protection of freedom of speech, not that everyone must bear the words, the obligation to speak, as many people long mouths, but very few prefer to say Freedom of speech on the constitutional level, just to give citizens a Choose to be a quiet person. Any person of their choice they do not violate freedom of expression obligations under the law, for example, citizens in court, This is the constitutional protection of freedom of speech. Freedom of speech in the Constitution only Therefore, relying solely on the provisions of the Constitution like freedom of speech freedom of speech does not necessarily able to achieve the exchanges and bring an open and democratic society. The constitutional freedom of expression The value of the boot process, the spirit of the legislation establishing the principles of constitutional freedom of expression in positive freedom and negative freedom to choose the value of the result of the conflict. Constitutional implementation process, the value of the constitutional legislator is to implement the constitutional right to choose the key provisions of the Constitution, not propaganda - legislators if you do not set clear, consistent with the legislative spirit of the Constitution and is scheduled to relevant legal principles to promote open expression of freedom of speech, freedom of speech protected by the Constitution Society, in the end is a feudal, closed society or a democratic, open society depends on the choice of individual citizens to freedom of speech game, the result can be a game that everyone is other positive expression, speech, communication If the citizen is the result of natural selection game Constitution does not cause a constitutional form of society. (A) freedom of expression and enforcement of the Constitution enforcement of the Constitution is constitutional. The implementation of constitutional rights is the key to the development of civilization development goals, clear speech, work, thought the production of responsibility, establishing a clear legislative principles of conflict of freedom of choice to choose and value system of allocation of responsibilities. The implementation of freedom of expression, the makers of freedom of expression must be declared under the terms of the Constitution, citizens generally on freedom of expression freedom of choice freedom of expression, freedom of speech to make access to the implementation and protection. Therefore, the constitutional development goals only with the necessary democratic and cultural exchanges, exchanges of information exchange systems and platforms. Value and allocation of responsibilities to guide the legislation requires the establishment of basic principles. Public statements of citizens freedom of speech and public expression of For individuals, the public expression have social burden, because the expression of open authorship occurred,
mbt schoenen online kopen
, mislead the public so that society can pay development costs, therefore, valuable, meaningful thought and expression has become a real scarcity of social resources. (and established the The state encourages citizens to obtain property rights for themselves and Copyright law is generally established based on the personal freedom of expression and property rights protection. The establishment of the legislative purpose of copyright law is to promote public statements citizens to express their ideas and disseminate their information, and promote exchange. Promote the Purpose is to support the constitutional government in building a democratic and open society.
Accordingly, the management of freedom of speech organs (mainly pointed out that the version of the review authority) on the publication of the review to establish what kind of attitude and the publication of censorship, freedom of speech is related to the implementation of the Constitution copyright management. The value of the review published in conflict with the freedom of speech makers the value of the first conflict in the face of choice. Legislative responsibilities in the allocation of public expression, the legislators how to set up regulatory and press scrutiny of news equitable distribution of public expression to the social responsibility without freedom of speech against the freedom of choice, a constitutional implementation of the Also related to the expression of the constitutional allocation of responsibility whether in the end, the work responsibilities for production,
ghd piastra
, information production and responsibilities of the key. Valuable comments that human society needs to guide the progress of human society. However, if the public expression of views adverse social development, human society will bear the costs and consequences of disadvantage. Therefore, the publication of the review responsibilities and the allocation of responsibilities of freedom of expression is directly related to development and progress of human civilization, a system protection. Seventeenth-century English Enlightenment thinker John. Milton in his In fact, the system is to limit the freedom of speech rather than protecting freedom of expression. Bentham also its and the best law to create the greatest happiness for the majority, but press freedom and freedom of public discussion is conducive to building good government. Appropriate censorship is necessary, but only in order to protect public interests and national interests. (B), freedom of speech can be limited by what? Freedom of speech as a legitimate power of civil society to citizens do not abuse their right to freedom of expression is limited. Copyright law does not specifically include the protection of personal and open dissemination of obscenity, false accusations, defamation, slander, destructive and negative expression of speech, nor undermine the protection of society, using religion to spread the teachings, ideas, freedom of speech involving national secrets, citizen privacy, obscene works, the company trade secret laws must be limited, otherwise, is the abuse of individual rights. Freedom of expression based on strict selection of However,
air jordan high heels
, under the principle of personal autonomy, strictly self-interested individuals will choose not to take more public expression of social responsibility and social risks. Especially open expression of the exercise of social responsibility is more criticism, suggestions and supervision. If someone asked to take the criticisms and suggestions and oversight powers, but also make more people first came to light Therefore, from the standpoint of individual self-interest, there will be who should bear the responsibility of exposing violations. If you first came to light, the first open expression of responsibility for the critics can not get better protection, people will choose Thus, legislators in the allocation of public expression of social responsibility, if the excessive burden of strengthening the legal consequences of personal expression and engraved to strict liability, will more people choose to Constitutional need for freedom of thought, freedom of the press, freedom of education and learning needed to protect the freedom of thought to provide adequate resources, scientific works, spiritual products, these products need someone to produce works. In addition to the first expression, the first person to produce works of intellectual property rights protection,
mbt chaussures paris
, implementation of constitutional and political rights, the key is to foster a tolerant social environment, the high responsibility of speech, publication of the review will guide the public to choose liberty, will eventually affect the works production, the community spirit of the product due to lack of incentive to produce and supply shortage. Can protect the U.S. Constitution two hundred years of American society's stability and prosperity, and the United States Constitution, the judge in the proceedings strictly implement the spirit of the Constitution, the responsibility for the consequences of personal expression continue to burden of proof by the principle of pragmatism, the principle of strict liability fault are inseparable. For example, in 1964, U.S. court that the defamation of government officials have been met even if the three basic elements of defamation - refers indeed recognized, published, and damage to reputation, he must also prove that the defendant have ,],[ More articles related to topics:
christian louboutin prezzi School year summary of
mbt schoenen On the debate of the Full Court in th
mbt schoenen City Board of Education summary of th
fora.pl
- załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo
Theme
FrayCan
created by
spleen
&
Download
Powered by
phpBB
© 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Regulamin