john9221
ORANGE EKSTRAKLASA
Dołączył: 25 Sty 2011
Posty: 1674
Przeczytał: 0 tematów
Ostrzeżeń: 0/5 Skąd: England
|
Wysłany: Pią 9:40, 11 Mar 2011 |
|
|
l affairs by the assumption of his
identity with one 'William Shakespeare' to whomaccording to an entry in the Bishop of Worcester's register
a license was issued on November 271582 (the day
before the signing of the Hathaway bond)authorising
his marriage with Anne Whateley of Temple Grafton. The theory that the maiden name of Shakespeare's wife
was Whateley is quite untenableand it is unsafe to assume that the bishop's clerkwhen making a note of the
grant of the license in his registererred so extensively as to write Anne Whateley of Temple Grafton' for
'Anne Hathaway of Shottery.' The husband of Anne Whateley cannot reasonably be identified with the poet.
He was doubtless another of the numerous William Shakespeares who abounded in the diocese of Worcester.
Had a license for the poet's marriage been secured on November 27{24} it is unlikely that the Shottery
husbandmen would have entered next day into a bond 'against impediments' the execution of which might
well have been d yilai:
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
[link widoczny dla zalogowanych]
http://www.cesarstworpg.fora.pl/rasy,3/on-the-makaloa-mat-londonjack-publishedaaomjx,7083.html#17249[link widoczny dla zalogowanych][link widoczny dla zalogowanych]nded as a preliminary to the grant of a license but was wholly supererogatory after the
grant was made.
III��THE FAREWELL TO STRATFORD
Anne Hathaway's greater burden of years and the likelihood that the poet was forced into marrying her by
her friends were not cir
Post został pochwalony 0 razy
|
|